Mark,
Good. Yes, I understand your viewpoint better now and agree with what you are saying. Yes, having options are good on a golf course. I like that too...it also produces mental meltdowns from some in tournaments when there are a lot of options and a decison has to made so that is important aspect of a great course setup to have some option as way to further identify worthy champions. I don't like looking for guys shots in the woods all day so we are on the same page about not wanting Safari golf. For me, it is exciting to watch someone hit fairways and greens and who can work the ball around the course. It is a beautiful thing to watch when a guy has that kind of game where they hit it in the proper quadrant of the green, have the optimum approach position into the green and pick apart a golf course. I don't see it very often, but that is what I love to see. Yes, a great recovery shot is really cool too every once in awhile. However, a steady diet of search misssions followed by great recoveries gets old quickly for me. I can handle competing against guys like that because I am putting the heat on hopefully where they know they have to keep that up and eventually they normally crack. On the ballstriking of the PGA Tour Pros, yes, I agree they hit the ball solid and can score well. This is not what we are talking about. It is the general state of the game where precision isn't being rewarded. Where guys who are very wild off the tee are winning tournaments. Where guys like Nick Price have to hit a 'fairway' that is a wide as a mower on 10 at Beth Page black. My expectation is that we should have someone who surpasses Ben Hogan, Jack Nicklaus, Sam Snead, and other greats. We are not seeing it. There is not one PGA Tour Pro that I believe is worthy of studying their swing to learn from. This is very frustrating. Yes, it is a high standard to out perform Ben Hogan and the other greats but this is what you see in all of the other sports...the standard gets better. It is not getting better in golf. Whether you believe it is the equipment, the golf ball, the course setups, the big money, the endorsements or some combination as being the reason, it is a fact that nobody on the PGA Tour is performing at a high standard for an extended period as these other greats did. This is what we are referencing too. We know that they all play better than us...no debate needed there...but are they striving to be the best that ever lived and are they performing at that level. Tiger Woods is the only PGA Tour Pro that has that standard to be the best that ever played Golf, but he is not performing to that standard at the moment and hopefully he will rise again. If you know of someone who is doing both (has stated they want too and is or even someone who is looking promising), then please let me know who. I would love to find that PGA Tour Player.
Thanks,
Rock
Mark Poniatowski wrote:
Doug,
I believe you took my "Straight" too literally. I meant straight as in US Open setups have such narrow fairways you can't strategically play to one side or another. It's fairway (shouldn't have said straight), green, two putt, par. I like that approach too, but I don't like it at a course where there are no options off the tee. Augusta used to have options off the tee but now the only option is smash it. Shame.
Of course I wouldn't want to play with a guy who plays safari golf, don't be silly. But we aren't talking about 30 handicaps. We are talking about plus sixes and up, not hacks. And actually the most exciting golf I've played with is guys who make incredible recovery shots...Walter Hagen style.
Also, "regular" golf courses are not good courses. And a hard course is not always (probably usually) a good one. Northern VA is filled with tree lined bores. I've from NJ originally and the architecture there is much more rich (Ross, Raynor, McKensie, Tilly, etc). Old style golf courses usually have expansive fairways that challenge the good golfer to think his way around a course and with challenging obstacles while still allowing the poorer player room to move the ball around and have fun. Sadly, modern architecture and technology has hazards to the left and right of fairways and doesn't allow many different options on approach shots.
Your dogleg example was perfect. Your idea of of great course would have a tight dogleg requiring a fade to position the ball in the fairway. My ideal dogleg would be a hole that can possibly be carried over the corner, which would also leave an open shot to a particular flag. Hitting a conservative middle of the fairway drive adjacent to the corner of the dogleg, would also work, but would leave a tougher approach to get close. What would the better golfer choose? That's up to him/her based on conditions.
Just my opinion. I guess I get a little bit annoyed at the disgust (could be exaggerated) shown by some folks regarding the quality of ball striking by professionals. I've played with very good amateurs and minitour pros. The difference between the pros and the amateurs is enormous in terms of ball striking and to say pga pros (not mini tourers) is crapola, coming from us, is simply crazy. Anyway, just trying to keep some perspective here.