BHSP,
If you believe it is possible, then it is possible. However, you have very poor goals. Why would you work on a swing and not tie that swing to a result. Why even hit a golf ball if all you care about is to copy someone else's movements and not the ball flight? It would save you a lot of money to reach your goal. You then say you want to break 100 and play in the Snead Flight on GCAT. Anyone can play in the Snead flight on the GCAT so anyone can attain that goal...why didn't you say my goal is to have a pulse if you want to set the bar so low that you have already attained it by being alive. How are you going to break 100 if you are only working on your swing and do not tie that to a result...with how you are directing your self with copying Hogan's every movement there is no correlation to any result so it is pure happen stance if you achieve that scoring goal. As I said, you have very poor goals. I could go on, but I will not. Please do not contact me if that is your goal. I have more important things to do with my time than to waste it with someone who has such a very poor goal. I wish you the best though.
Thanks,
Doug
Ben Hogan Swing Project wrote:
Doug Burke wrote:
BHSP,
What are you after?
Thanks,
Doug
Ben Hogan Swing Project wrote:
My swing rebuild project is "a basic test of observational learning. Is it possible to teach the body to do an entirely unknown movement using video analysis and repetitive training? How close can I come to Hogan’s golf swing?"
It is a thesis. I'm after the Hogan swing. From tee-up, to step-away, to step-in, to waggle, to forward press, to full swing, to finish.
And I always have to add a disclaimer that ball flight, trajectory, sound, scoring, draw or fade are not part of the project. Only goal on scoring is to shoot in the 90's ffom the white tees, and maybe play on the Golf Channel AM Tour in the Snead flight.
Understood Sir. Will definitely not be contacting you; I don't want to distract you from your personal goal. Hmmmm, very interesting take you have on somebody elses "personal" goal. It appears you have a cool rating system. Wonder how I could move from the "very poor" rating to "acceptable to contact Doug" rating.
Rock Response: Your decision. As I will not waste my time helping someone with a goal to make every movement like Ben Hogan. I am not interested in teaching you to do that. I have to want to teach you for me to help you. Not interested as long as your goal remains that.
I am very respectful in regards to everyone's personal golfing goal, whether it be to score lower, or hit the ball farther, or decrease their putting avg, or whatever. You will never hear me say anything negative about anybody's game or swing, even if it isn't in line with my thinking/methodology/beliefs.
Rock Response: I was respectful. I wished you the best. I said you could reach your goal...please leave me out of it.
The more feedback I get on this, the more eye-opening it is that many, many, many people want to somehow "force" their goal or thinking or way of life on everyone else. Ask around and find out everyone's golfing goal...or even life goal....it may not be in line with what you are doing.
Rock Response: I am not trying to force you to do anything. I am telling you I am not interested in what you are doing and want no part of it.
Examples:
75 year old man plays golf because his doctor told him it would help with his triple bypass exercise program. He shoots in the 130's, and 6- putts every other green.
Rock Response: Great. He is getting exercise and playing recreationally. If he wanted my help to 5 putt, then I could help him do that.
18 year old man plays golf because he has a very intense ego, and needs to define himself to fit in with his peers. His only goal is either to hit the ball 300yards, or outdrive all his playing partners....whichever is longer. He shoots in the 90's, but could go a lot lower if he put the driver down and focused on shot location rather than the Remax challenge.
Rock Response: I would not help him. Hitting the ball long is not a goal I concur with and I would not want to waste my time teaching that.
44 year old woman plays golf because she gets to spend time with her husband. She has played with him for the past 25 years, but shoots in the 100's because she refuses to take lessons.
Rock Response: Sounds like she is a recreational golfer and is not interested in having a teacher. Another pointless example just like your goal.
My question to you....which one of these is right? Which one of these is wrong? In my opinion, there is no right or wrong lol.....
Rock Response: Agreed. Everyone has their own free will in what they do. I can only teach people who want to learn. I have to understand their goal and believe I can help them achieve that goal. If I do not belive that, I will not waste my time or their time...that is what you call respecting my self and others.
You could probably sit back and tell each person how to score lower and how to hit it more solidly, if that is your ultimate goal. If you are into into "Defining" what those people"should" be doing, then you have issues my friend. Someday you will accept that what your goals are may not be in line with the rest of the world.
Rock Response: You do not know me. I will help people reach their goal as I stated.
In Doug's rating system, how would the 75-year old man, or 18-year old man, or 44-year old woman be tagged. Which ones would be very poor, or poor, or ok, or so-so, or too aggressive, or overboard, or just right?
Rock Response: You are missing the point entirely. I am not rating anyone. I am making a decision on what I will do. Your post explains further why I would not teach you. I already spent more time than I should have with you.